What should go into CAC?
Media spend, the salaries of the people who run acquisition, agency and freelance fees, and the tools they use. Not product, not support, not fulfilment: those serve customers you already have.
What it really costs to win a customer, including the parts an ad platform cannot see.
Enter your media spend, the team and tool costs behind it, and the new customers you won. The gap between this and your platform figure is the part nobody reports.
Everything here is worked out in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere, and there is no account to make.
Salaries, retainers, freelancers. The part the platforms never see.
New only. Repeat orders from existing customers do not belong in an acquisition cost.
Optional. Adds the LTV to CAC ratio. Use the contribution version.
Optional. Gives the payback period in months.
Result
The numbers below are an example so the tool opens working. Replace them with yours.
What comes out
How to use it
Everything you paid the platforms in the period, across every channel you are attributing these customers to.
Salaries, agency retainers, freelancers, tools. This is the step that turns a cost per acquisition into a customer acquisition cost.
Repeat orders from people you already had did not need acquiring. Counting them makes acquisition look cheap by crediting it with revenue it did not win.
Customer acquisition cost is everything you spent to win a customer, divided by the customers you won. The important word is everything: the media, the people who ran it, the agency, and the software they used.
An ad platform can only see its own spend, so the number it reports is always smaller. On the example figures here it is 160 against a real CAC of 230, and the 70 in between is the part no report shows you.
Both figures appear in the result for that reason. Seeing them next to each other is usually the first time the gap gets looked at.
A ratio tells you whether a customer is worth more than they cost. It does not tell you whether you can afford to wait for it, and those are different questions.
Payback period answers the second one: how many months a customer takes to return what you spent winning them. A business paying for stock up front and waiting eleven months to get its acquisition cost back needs funding, whatever the ratio says.
That is why the payback line sits under the ratio rather than instead of it. The ratio is about whether growth works; payback is about whether it can be paid for.
The tool
Team, agency and tools sit next to media spend, which is the difference between a CAC and a platform number.
The real CAC and the media only version, so the gap between what you spend and what gets reported is on screen.
Enter media alone and the tool says so. Salaries and tools usually add between 20% and 60%, and leaving them out is how this number gets understated.
Enter a lifetime value and you get the ratio, with a note on where the three to one convention came from and why it may not fit you.
Months to recover the acquisition cost, which is the figure that decides whether growth needs funding.
A ratio under one to one means you pay more for a customer than they are worth, and the tool names it rather than printing it flat.
Reading the result
We look at your search visibility across Google and the answer engines, and tell you what is costing you orders. No charge for the first look.
In practice
Platform figures are not CAC, and presenting one as the other is the fastest way to lose an argument later.
A channel that needs three people to run it is not cheap because its media is. Split the team cost across channels and compare properly.
A long payback with a healthy ratio is a cash flow question rather than a marketing one, and it is better asked early.
Put the retainer in the team cost. If CAC moves more than the media saved, that is the answer.
Questions
Media spend, the salaries of the people who run acquisition, agency and freelance fees, and the tools they use. Not product, not support, not fulfilment: those serve customers you already have.
Three to one is quoted everywhere and it came from software, where gross margins are far higher than a business buying stock. A store funding inventory usually wants four to one, because the cash leaves earlier and comes back later.
Contribution, after cost of goods. The revenue version makes the ratio look better by exactly the amount your goods cost, which is the one part of it you never get to keep.
No. Only new customers. Including repeats credits acquisition with revenue that came from retention, and makes the cheapest looking channel the one selling to people you already had.
Long enough for the spend and the customers to line up. A month is usually too short for anything with a sales cycle: the customers who signed in March were often reached in January.
No. Everything is worked out in your browser, with no account and nothing uploaded.
The rest of the set
Customer acquisition cost is the half of the ratio you can move this month. The other half is lifetime value, and a CAC that looks high is often a payback question rather than a spending one.
Where this comes up