What is a good ROAS?
The one that clears your break-even, which is set by your margin rather than by an industry figure. A store keeping 30p of every pound needs 3.33x to break even; a store keeping 50p needs 2x.
Return on ad spend from revenue and spend, or the revenue a target needs. Fill in two of the three.
Fill in any two of revenue, spend and ROAS. Add your margin and the tool says whether the return is leaving anything behind.
Everything here is worked out in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere, and there is no account to make.
Leave this blank to work it out from the other two.
Optional. Adds cost per order and average order value.
Optional. Says whether the ROAS is leaving any profit behind.
Result
The numbers below are an example so the tool opens working. Replace them with yours.
What comes out
How to use it
Both from the same window and the same platform. Two platforms attribute differently, so a combined ROAS is rarely the number you think it is.
Enter a target ROAS and your spend, leave revenue blank, and you get the revenue that target requires.
This is the step people skip. Without it the tool reports a return; with it, the tool can say whether the return is profitable.
Return on ad spend is gross revenue divided by what you paid to get it. A 4x means four units of revenue for every one of spend, and it is the figure ad platforms report because it is the one they can see.
What they cannot see is what your goods cost. A 4x on a 20% margin loses money and a 2x on a 60% margin makes it, and nothing in the ROAS itself separates those two cases.
That is what the margin field is for. Enter it and the result carries a profit line underneath the return.
A ROAS calculator can tell you what a campaign returned. It cannot tell you the floor that campaign had to clear, because the floor needs your return rate and your variable costs, and those are a different question.
That calculation has its own page. Putting a second break-even number here would leave a reader with two definitions on one site and no way to know which one to trust, which is exactly the failure this site keeps writing about.
What this tool will do is warn you. If your margin says the campaign is losing money while the ROAS looks fine, the result says so and points at the page that works out the floor properly.
The tool
Leave revenue, spend or ROAS blank and the tool works out that one. Useful for turning a target ROAS into a revenue requirement.
Advertising cost of sale is the same relationship inverted, and some platforms report only that one.
Enter the order count and you get the cost per order and the average order value, which are the two figures a ROAS conversation usually needs next.
With a margin entered, the result carries gross profit after ad spend rather than leaving the reader to do it in their head.
A positive ROAS that loses money at your margin gets named, and pointed at the calculation that works out the real floor.
The floor needs returns and variable costs. That is a different page rather than a simplified version of it here.
Reading the result
We look at your search visibility across Google and the answer engines, and tell you what is costing you orders. No charge for the first look.
In practice
Enter the ROAS you have been asked to hit and the budget, and see the revenue that implies. Some targets stop being reasonable at this step.
Add the margin. A 3x on a thin margin can be a losing month reported as a win.
Run each one on its own numbers. Do not add the revenues together: two platforms often claim the same order.
Work out the floor on the break-even page first, then use this one to see what the campaign returned against it.
Questions
The one that clears your break-even, which is set by your margin rather than by an industry figure. A store keeping 30p of every pound needs 3.33x to break even; a store keeping 50p needs 2x.
ROAS uses gross revenue and only counts ad spend. ROI uses profit and counts every cost. ROAS is easier to measure and easier to misread, which is why the margin field here matters.
Advertising cost of sale: spend divided by revenue, as a percentage. It is ROAS inverted. Amazon reports ACoS where Google and Meta report ROAS, and people compare them without converting more often than you would think.
No. Both platforms may claim the same order under their own attribution, so adding the revenues counts it twice. Run each one separately and treat the total as a question rather than a figure.
Not as the platform reports it. Revenue is counted at the point of sale, and a refund later does not remove it. That is one of the reasons a break-even calculation needs the return rate in it.
No. Everything is worked out in your browser, with no account and nothing uploaded.
The rest of the set
Return on ad spend is revenue over spend, so it knows nothing about margin. Two accounts at the same ROAS can be one profitable and one not, which is what the break-even version settles.
Where this comes up