What is the difference between CPA and CAC?
CPA counts media spend only. CAC adds the salaries, retainers and tools that produced the campaigns, so it is always larger. If yours are equal, the CAC is missing something.
What one acquisition costs from media spend, and the ceiling your margin allows. Fill in two of the three.
Fill in any two of spend, conversions and cost per acquisition. Add your margin and the tool says whether each acquisition pays for itself.
Everything here is worked out in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere, and there is no account to make.
Leave this blank to work it out from the other two.
Optional. Adds revenue and ROAS.
Optional. Gives the CPA ceiling one order can pay for.
Result
The numbers below are an example so the tool opens working. Replace them with yours.
What comes out
How to use it
Media spend only, and the conversions that spend produced. Keep both from the same window.
Enter a target CPA and a conversion count to see the budget that implies.
That gives you the ceiling: what one order contributes is the most an acquisition can cost before it stops paying for itself.
They get used as if they were the same one, and the confusion is expensive. Cost per lead prices an enquiry. Cost per acquisition prices a conversion from media spend. Customer acquisition cost prices a customer including the salaries, retainers and tools that produced the campaigns.
CAC is structurally the largest of the three, and that is a definition rather than a fault. If your CPA and your CAC come out the same, something is being left out of the CAC.
This page does the middle one. The other two have their own pages, and the numbers are meant to differ.
The simple ceiling is contribution per order: order value times margin. Pay more than that for an acquisition and the order loses money before anything else in the business is paid for.
It is a simple ceiling on purpose. The real floor needs your return rate and your variable costs, and that calculation lives on the break-even ROAS page. Putting a second version of it here would give the site two break-even definitions and leave the reader to choose.
What this tool will do is say when you are over the line, and point at the page that works the floor out properly.
The tool
Leave spend, conversions or the CPA blank and the tool works out that one.
Contribution per order, which is the most an acquisition can cost before it stops paying for itself.
When your CPA is above that ceiling the tool says so, rather than showing a number that looks fine on its own.
Salaries and tools are not in this figure. Adding them quietly would make the CPA look like a CAC without saying so.
With an order value, the same inputs give you the return as well as the cost.
Disagreement of more than one percent gets named instead of resolved for you.
Reading the result
We look at your search visibility across Google and the answer engines, and tell you what is costing you orders. No charge for the first look.
In practice
Work out the ceiling from your margin first. A target CPA set without it is a number somebody hoped for.
Two campaigns selling different products have different ceilings. The same CPA can be good on one and fatal on the other.
Enter the CPA you can afford and the conversions you want, and the spend follows.
A discount lowers the margin, which lowers the ceiling. Run the numbers on the discounted margin.
Questions
CPA counts media spend only. CAC adds the salaries, retainers and tools that produced the campaigns, so it is always larger. If yours are equal, the CAC is missing something.
Anything below what one order contributes, which is your order value times your margin. That number is different for every business, which is why an industry average cannot answer this.
Whichever you count, count it consistently. A CPA built on add to carts and compared against a CPA built on purchases describes two different things and looks like a win.
Not as it is calculated here, because platforms count a conversion at the point of sale. If your return rate is high, the break-even ROAS page handles it properly.
A target CPA you set on a platform is an instruction to the bidder. The number here is what the account did, and the ceiling is what you can afford. Setting the first without knowing the third is common and expensive.
No. Everything is worked out in your browser, with no account and nothing uploaded.
The rest of the set
Cost per acquisition only means something next to what an acquisition is worth. On its own it is a number you can always make smaller by buying less of everything.
Where this comes up